Two years after the release of ChatGPT, many university professors remain skeptical about generative AI. A common prejudice is that “writing with AI is cheating!” In fact, tools like ChatGPT can indeed generate entire text passages in a scientific tone, provided they are supplied with enough specialist texts and a clear task. However, when it comes to academic writing, not everything that is theoretically possible is sensible or advisable. Allowing an AI writing tool to compose most of a seminar, bachelor’s, or master’s thesis poses risks of plagiarism, copyright violations, errors, and inaccuracies. Language models are not suitable for research, as they are only trained to produce grammatically correct texts. Furthermore, authors who rely heavily on AI-generated content engage less deeply with their subject than those who write independently. Those who let AI do most of the work learn little in the process. If authors can no longer take responsibility for their texts, the reliability of science is compromised. Therefore, having entire works written by AI is scientifically unethical.
Many scenarios involving AI in writing do align with good scientific practice. The potential for relieving workload and improving quality is significant. AI has long been integrated into scientific writing processes: researchers use AI output for inspiration, critically evaluate it, and significantly develop it for their purposes. AI can serve as an idea generator, mentor, and proofreader.
In terms of tutoring, AI can assist in teaching complex concepts or offering clarification on specific topics. It can provide guidance on structuring essays or suggest improvements to existing drafts. Additionally, AI can help with research by suggesting relevant sources or summarizing large volumes of information, although it should not replace thorough research conducted by the author themselves.
For text refinement, AI tools can offer suggestions for enhancing clarity, coherence, and style. They can identify grammatical errors and suggest corrections, making the writing process more efficient and polished. However, it’s crucial for writers to critically assess AI suggestions to maintain the originality and integrity of their work.
While AI can be a valuable tool in academic writing, it’s essential to use it responsibly. Over-reliance on AI can lead to a lack of understanding and engagement with the subject matter. Writers should use AI to complement their efforts, ensuring they remain actively involved in the creation of their work.
In conclusion, AI has the potential to enhance the process of scientific writing by acting as an idea generator, mentor, and proofreader. However, it is vital to use AI ethically and responsibly, ensuring that the final work remains a product of the author’s understanding and effort. By critically engaging with AI outputs and integrating them thoughtfully, writers can benefit from the advantages of AI while maintaining the integrity of their work.